Patroklos PatroklouGRC vs Traditional Risk Management: Guide for Belgian Organisations
Belgian organisations often manage GDPR risks separately from compliance, creating silos. GRC integrates governance, risk and compliance for GBA/APD and NIS2 requirements.
Traditional Risk Management Limitations
Spreadsheets rarely link risks to GDPR legal bases or NIS2 supply chain security, failing DPA 2026-2028 proactive controls.
GRC: Integrated for Belgian Regulations
GRC connects risks to GDPR Article 5/6 bases, NIS2 risk analysis and Data Protection Act obligations with board visibility.
Table: GRC vs Traditional Risk Management
| Aspect | Traditional | GRC |
|---|---|---|
| Scope | Departmental | Organisation‑wide GDPR/NIS2 |
| Data | Spreadsheets | Central GDPR‑ready platform |
| GDPR Link | Limited | Full legal basis mapping |
Why GRC Fits Belgium
GBA/APD fines for insufficient legal bases require integrated GRC. NIS2 mandates governance and incident reporting.
Enactia for Belgian GRC
Enactia integrates GDPR, NIS2 risks. Visit https://enactia.com/ and demo at https://enactia.com/demo-request/.
